transparent gif


Ej inloggad.

Göteborgs universitets publikationer

Shared Decision Making, Paternalism and Patient Choice

Författare och institution:
Lars Sandman (-); Christian Munthe (Institutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori)
Publicerad i:
Health Care Analysis, 18 ( 1 ) s. 60-84
Artikel, refereegranskad vetenskaplig
Fulltextlänk (lokalt arkiv):
Sammanfattning (abstract):
In patient centred care, shared decision making is a central feature and widely referred to as a norm for patient centred medical consultation. However, it is far from clear how to distinguish SDM from standard models and ideals for medical decision making, such as paternalism and patient choice, and e.g., whether paternalism and patient choice can involve a greater degree of the sort of sharing involved in SDM and still retain their essential features. In the article, different versions of SDM are explored, versions compatible with paternalism and patient choice as well as versions that go beyond these traditional decision making models. Whenever SDM is discussed or introduced it is of importance to be clear over which of these different versions are being pursued, since they connect to basic values and ideals of health care in different ways. It is further argued that we have reason to pursue versions of SDM involving, what is called, a high level dynamics in medical decision-making. This leaves four alternative models to choose between depending on how we balance between the values of patient best interest, patient autonomy, and an effective decision in terms of patient compliance or adherence: Shared Rational Deliberative Patient Choice, Shared Rational Deliberative Paternalism, Shared Rational Deliberative Joint Decision, and Professionally Driven Best Interest Compromise. In relation to these models it is argued that we ideally should use the Shared Rational Deliberative Joint Decision model. However, when the patient and professional fail to reach consensus we will have reason to pursue the Professionally Driven Best Interest Compromise model since this will best harmonise between the different values at stake: patient best interest, patient autonomy, patient adherence and a continued care relationship.
Ämne (baseras på Högskoleverkets indelning av forskningsämnen):
Hälsovetenskaper ->
Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi
Hälsovetenskaper ->
Filosofi, etik och religion ->
Filosofi ->
Praktisk filosofi
Paternalism - Patient autonomy - Patient best interest - Patient centred care - Patient choice - Shared decision-making - Patient adherence
Ytterligare information:
Online access: DOI: 10.1007/s10728-008-0108-6
Postens nummer:
Posten skapad:
2009-04-09 09:39
Posten ändrad:
2010-02-17 10:41

Visa i Endnote-format

Göteborgs universitet • Tel. 031-786 0000
© Göteborgs universitet 2007